Drawing for NATIONAL DAY OF GENEROSITY

USPTO serial 76534160

NATIONAL DAY OF GENEROSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIONAL DAY OF GENEROSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy Oliver LeSourd

NANCY OLIVER LESOURD GAMMON & GRANGE, PC8280 GREENSBORO DR SEVENTH FLMCLEAN, VA 22102-3807UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting public awareness of the importance of philanthropy and charitable giving by promoting education and governmental recognition of the importance of philanthropy and charitable giving through public relations, lobbying, and legislative efforts; online retail store services featuring T-shirts, sweatshirts, golf shirts, caps, visors, jackets, umbrellas, tote bags, book bags, backpacks, mugs, cups, prerecorded video tapes, pre-recorded audio tapes, CDs, CD-ROMs, DVDs, and multimedia software recorded on CD-ROMs, and publications and printed material, all in the fields of philanthropy and charitable giving; and arranging and conducting business conferences in the fields of philanthropy, charitable giving, charitable fundraising, and motivational techniques for encouraging philanthropy and charitable giving, and course materials distributed in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance