USPTO serial 76534328
ADVANCED CG SILICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ADVANCED CG SILICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Costellia
Jeffrey L. Costellia NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9th Street, N.W.Suite 900Washington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, thermometers not for medical use, pressure gauges, zenith telescopes; magnetic measuring instruments, namely, voltmeters, ammeters; photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, video cameras and digital cameras; motion picture apparatus and instruments, namely,motion picture cameras; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, spectacles; electrical communication machines and apparatus, namely, personal digital assistants, mobile communicators, namely, personal digital assistants, mobile communicators, namely, cellular phones, mobile phones, personal digital assistants; applied electronic machines and apparatus and components, namely, word processors, computers, wearable computers, computer terminals, calculators, voting machines, vending machines, display panels, namely liquid crystal display panels, flat panel displays, head mount displays, goggle-type displays; portable computers electronic calendar devices, namely, electronic railroad schedule displays, electronic personal calendars; televisions; global positioning systems consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers, and network interface devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, thermometers, electrocardiographs (EKG) and CAT scanners and component parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Furnaces; dryers used for the removal of vapor contaminants from compressed air and gases; and gas generators, namely, ethylene gas generators and electrochemical gas generators | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Transportation machines and equipment, namely, automobile dashboards and component parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Hand held units for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ADVANCED CG SILICON
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |