Drawing for PEERPLACE

USPTO serial 76534677

PEERPLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2954253Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 24, 2005
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PEERPLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie A. Martinez

Stephanie A. Martinez McGuireWoods LLP800 East Canal StreetSuite 1000Richmond, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely-case management software for the social services industrySECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2025CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Oct 19, 2025WDRLOTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2025XXXXPOST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION—
Sep 22, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 19, 2025ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 24, 2024REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2023CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2023COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 26, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2014NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 201415AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Apr 8, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 201415AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Apr 7, 2014E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 20108.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 13, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2010ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Jun 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance