Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76534711?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76534711. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns COMPUTERTRAINING.COM?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76534711, the listed owner(s) include: ComputerTraining.com, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76534711?

Serial number 76534711 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark COMPUTERTRAINING.COM. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of COMPUTERTRAINING.COM?

COMPUTERTRAINING.COM (76534711) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover COMPUTERTRAINING.COM?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76534711

COMPUTERTRAINING.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601

Filing date: Jul 23, 2003
Status date: Oct 6, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTERTRAINING.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

ComputerTraining.com, Inc.
Hunt Valley, MD
Other trademarks owned by ComputerTraining.com, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned T. Himmelrich

NED T HIMMELRICH GORDON FEINBLATT ROTHMAN HOFFBERGER233 E REDWOOD STBALTIMORE, MD 21202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	vocational education in the field of technology and the use of computers	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Oct 10, 2006	MAB1	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT	—
Oct 6, 2006	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Oct 5, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 10, 2006	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 10, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 15, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 2, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 2, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 2, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 2, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Dec 3, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 26, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 26, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Sep 28, 2004	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Sep 28, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 27, 2004	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2004	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 9, 2004	FAXX	FAX SENT	—
Jan 23, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2003	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—