Drawing for MAX BRENNER

USPTO serial 76534929

MAX BRENNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX BRENNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD NATTER

HOWARD NATTER NATTER & NATTER501 5TH AVE STE 808NEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043RESTAURANT, BAR, CAFETERIA AND CAFE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 23, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 23, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 23, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 30, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance