USPTO serial 76534938
CLEMENTE JACQUES TOMATO CATSUP LA BOTELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CLEMENTE JACQUES TOMATO CATSUP LA BOTELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Riverside, CA, US
Riverside, CA, US
SANTIAGO DE QUERETARO QRO., MX
Riverside, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mariana Paula Noli
Mariana Paula Noli NOLI IP Solutions PC1902 Wright PlaceSuite 200Carlsbad, CA 92008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Bingo cards; bingo game playing equipment; equipment sold as a unit for playing bingo board game; and lottery cards in the nature of a bingo-type game | ACTIVE | Dec 9, 1913 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Don Clemente, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Don Clemente, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SANCHEZ QUIROZ, MARTHA MARIA
- Other trademarks owned by Don Clemente, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named CLEMENTE JACQUES TOMATO CATSUP LA BOTELLA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 29, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |