USPTO serial 76535064
UNDERCOVER ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNDERCOVER ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Knull, Vanessa Riviere, Marc S. Ullman
CHARLES H KNULL ULLMAN, SHAPIRO & ULLMAN299 BROADWAY STE 1700NEW YORK, NY 10007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care preparations, namely, lotions, creams, non-medicated ointments, toners, oils, mists, gels, conditioners, sprays and moisturizers; tanning preparations for sun protection, all the above only sold through tanning salons and beauty salons that have tanning as an on-site service | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |