USPTO serial 76535120
NETWORK VIDEO RECORDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETWORK VIDEO RECORDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADAM C. VOLENTINE
ADAM C VOLENTINE VOLENTINE FRANCOS, PLLC12200 SUNRISE VLY DRSTE 150RESTON, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Theft Protection Devices, Namely, Monitoring Camera, Cash Registers, Digital Imaging Storing Devices, Namely, Digital Video Recorders (DVRS), Digital Image Storing Devices, Namely, DVRS, For Theft Protection Devices, Digital Image Storing Devices, Namely, DVRS, For Cash Registers, And Security Apparatus, Namely, CCD Camera, (covered by Korean priority application 40-2003-0007045) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Digital Independent Sales Representatives In The Fields Of Digital Image Storage Devices, Digital Image Storage Devices For Anti-Theft Systems; Digital Image Storage Devices For Cash Registers, And Digital Image Storage Devices For Security Apparatus, (covered by Korean priority application 41-2003-0003206) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |