Drawing for SIGNET

USPTO serial 76535157

SIGNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIGNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan M. Meschkow

JORDAN M MESCHKOW MESCHKOW & GRESHAM, PLC5727 N SEVENTH STSTE 409PHOENIX, AZ 85014-5818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Hand vacuum pumps and remote engine startersACTIVEMay 1, 1994
009Automotive testing equipment, namely inductive timing lights, digital timing lights, PCM code readers, PCM scan tools, dwell/tachometer testers, vehicle sensor testers, ignition module testers, volt ohm meters, digital multimeters, digital engine analyzers, battery and charging system testers, compression testers, vacuum-fuel pump testers, vacuum gauges, pressure testers, brake bleeding kits, tachometers, temperature gauges, pressure gauges and voltage gaugesACTIVEJun 1, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance