USPTO serial 76535323
THE HOTEL NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 2004
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE HOTEL NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
Paul J. Reilly Baker Botts L.L.P.30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES AND PROMOTING THE TELEVISION BROADCASTING AND HOTEL SERVICES OF OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 2004 |
| 038 | TELEVISION BROADCASTING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 2004 |
| 041 | Entertainment SERVICES, NAMELY, DISTRIBUTION OF TELEVISION PROGRAMMING TO THE HOTEL INDUSTRY AND OTHER OUT-OF-HOME LOCATIONS; TELEVISION PROGRAMMING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE HOTEL NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hotelevision, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hotelevision, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE HOTEL NETWORKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 29, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 31, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |