Drawing for MONTEREY CAFE

USPTO serial 76535696

MONTEREY CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONTEREY CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori M. Stockton

LORI M STOCKTON BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared Mexican appetizers consisting primarily of meat and cheese; Frozen, Mexican-style food products, namely, chile rellenosACTIVE—
030Frozen, Mexican-style food products, namely, tamales, burritos, enchiladas, chimichangas, taquitos, flautas, tacos, soft tacosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 28, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 9, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 11, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance