Drawing for DESIGNED TO BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY

USPTO serial 76535701

DESIGNED TO BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGNED TO BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert G. Schuler

ROBERT G SCHULER KEGLER BROWN HILL & RITTER LPA65 E STATE ST STE 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agency services; market research services; public relations services; direct marketing advertising services for others; business marketing consulting services; business consulting services in the field of interactive marketing and advertising; brand consulting services, namely, providing information in the fields of brand identity and corporate identity; sales promotion, namely, developing promotional and informational materials for others for distributionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 25, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance