USPTO serial 76535840
PACER+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACER+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA900 2ND AVE S STE 820INTERNATIONAL CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Implantable cardiac rhythm management devices capable of sensing heart activity and providing pacing and defibrillating therapy as needed | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 24, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |