USPTO serial 76535843
REBEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REBEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah Anne Keefe
Sarah Anne Keefe Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC1201 West Peachtree Street, Suite 3500P. O. Box 7037, Atlanta, GA 30357-0037Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | GRASS SEED | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |