USPTO serial 76535857
BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard A. MacCord, Jr.
Perry J. Viscounty Latham & Watkins LLP650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | FITTED CAR COVERS AND CAR SEAT COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | UMBRELLAS, BACKPACKS, PURSES, LUGGAGE, PET BLANKETS, PET COATS | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | CUSHIONS, SLEEPING BAGS, DECORATIVE PILLOWS; FITTED FABRIC FURNITURE COVERS, PET BED | ABANDONED | — |
| 022 | TARPAULINS, UNFITTED CAR COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | OUTDOOR FURNITURE FABRICS, BEACH TOWELS, DRAPERIES, WINDOW TREATMENTS, NAMELY, POUFS, PUFFS, SHAMS, LINEN, TEXTILE TAPESTRIES, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, BED SHEETS, BEDSPREADS, DUST RUFFLES, PILLOW COVERS, PILLOW SHAMS, BED BLANKETS, MATTRESS PADS, QUILTS, UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE COVERS, CUSHION COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 027 | DOORMATS, CARPETS, RUGS, CLOTH WALL COVERINGS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | PLAY TENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buzz Off Insect Shield, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Buzz Off Insect Shield, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named BUZZ OFF INSECT SHIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |