Drawing for TIDY DINER

USPTO serial 76535999

TIDY DINER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TIDY DINER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven C. Schnedler

STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER SCHNEDLER & MONTEITH, PAP O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Portable high chair covers made of fabric, for use with high chairs in restaurantsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 29, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 29, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 21, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 21, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance