Drawing for ST. TROPEZ THE INSTANT SELF TAN

USPTO serial 76536323

ST. TROPEZ THE INSTANT SELF TAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ST. TROPEZ THE INSTANT SELF TAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

Susan Upton Douglass Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETICS, NAMELY, SELF TANNING SPRAYS, AFTER SUN LOTIONS, EXFOLIATION SCRUBS, SKIN LOTIONS, LOOSE AND PRESSED FACE POWDERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, SELF TANNING LOTIONS, SELF TANNING MOUSSES, SUN BLOCKS, SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS, and SUN SCREENING PREPARATIONSACTIVEAug 12, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 9, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 8, 2009EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 27, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 21, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 9, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 3, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 13, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance