USPTO serial 76536356
ISABEL ROSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISABEL ROSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry H. Fishkin
BARRY H FISHKIN C/O PHILLIPS NIZER LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SLEEPWEAR, NAMELY GOWNS, ROBES, PAJAMAS, CAFTANS OF VARIOUS FABRICS AND LENGTHS AND SLEEP SEPARATES CONSISTING OF SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, BOXER BOTTOMS AND LONG PANTS; DAYWEAR, NAMELY CHEMISES, TEDDIES, SLIPS, HALF-SLIPS, TAP PANTS, CAMISOLES, FASHION BRAS AND PANTIES; LOUNGEWEAR, NAMELY, ROBES, CAFTANS, PAJAMAS, JOGGING TYPE SUITS; FOUNDATIONS, NAMELY, BRAS AND PANTIES; SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAROLE HOCHMAN DESIGN GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Carole Hochman Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Carole Hochman Designs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ISABEL ROSE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |