Drawing for GEOSAS

USPTO serial 76536418

GEOSAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GEOSAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Galgano

THOMAS M GALGANO GALGANO & BURKE300 RABRO DR STE 135HAUPPAUGE, NY 11788UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computerized synthetic aperture sonar system, namely hardware and software for use in marine or underwater environments used to conduct geophysical surveys, measure, count and record data involving geophysical, geological and bathymetric profiles from various instrumentation platforms including underwater vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 8, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 4, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance