Drawing for PACEMAKER+

USPTO serial 76536437

PACEMAKER+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PACEMAKER+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James T. Nikolai

JAMES T NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU PA900 2ND AVE S STE 820INTERNATIONAL CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Cardiac rhythm management devices capable of sensing heart activity and providing pacing and defibrillating therapy as neededABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 4, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 2, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 26, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 26, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 26, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 8, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance