USPTO serial 76536463
BKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Perkowski
THOMAS J PERKOWSKI THOMAS J. PERKOWSKI, PCSOUNDVIEW PLZ1266 E MAIN STSTAMFORD, CT 06902Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Server-side driven brand marketing communication instruments, namely, server-side multi-mode virtual kiosks having multiple modes of display operation for displaying rich-media advertising spots, promotional spots, and brand information networks composed of virtually any media format, which are indexed using brand-related information keys; and an industrial strength Internet-based brand marketing communication instrumentation network for remotely programming the modes of display operation of said multi-mode virtual kiosks so that marketers of product and service brands can communicate directly and freely with consumers anywhere along the Internet, without adversely affecting their trading partners, and enable the reliable delivery of valuable brand building information resources to such consumers, regardless of where such brand building information resources may actually be hosted on information servers connected to the Internet | ACTIVE | May 21, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BKS Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BKS Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Brandkey Systems Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BKS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |