USPTO serial 76536504
THE BEST OF ZEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE BEST OF ZEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Fort Worth, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 4000, 2425 W OLYMPIC BLSANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Organizing and conducting trade shows in the field of food products and services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Awards programs and contests for excellence in the fields of food products and services, restaurants, trade shows and festivals; providing recognition and incentives by way of awards and contests to demonstrate excellence in the fields of food products and services, restaurants, trade shows and festivals; entertainment, namely, conducting contests and fairs in the field of food products and services; educational services, namely, providing incentives to people and organizations to demonstrate excellence in the field of food products and services through the issuance of awards; educational services, namely, providing workshops and conferences in the fields of food products and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZESTY LIFESTYLE, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by ZESTY LIFESTYLE, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by GOODMAN MEDIA GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Avenue Chile Pepper, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE BEST OF ZEST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |