USPTO serial 76536601
ZIELONKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZIELONKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
33689 Bielefeld, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Safran
DAVID S SAFRAN NIXON PEABODY LLP.8180 GREENSBORO DR STE 800MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys; goods made or plated with precious metals or their alloys, especially ash trays made of high-grade steel; cleaning instruments made of high-grade steel, especially for cleaning of the human skin or for cleaning of the ambient air; toilet stones made of high-grade steel, bottle fasteners made of high-grade steel, cigarette extinguisher made of aluminum or high-grade steel, egg cups made of high-grade steel, containers made of high-grade steel for household or kitchen, household goods made of high-grade steel, candle snuffers made of high-grade steel, candle holders made of high-grade steel, candle sticks made of high-grade steel, house-hold baskets made of highgrade steel, tie-holders, tie-pins, all goods included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |