Drawing for WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM ENGINEERING BETTER VISION; ZWAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM

USPTO serial 76536640

WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM ENGINEERING BETTER VISION; ZWAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM ENGINEERING BETTER VISION; ZWAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS DESIGN; WAVE CONTACT LENS SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS C. SAITTA

THOMAS C SAITTA ROGERS TOWERS PA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the creation of custom designed contact lenses based on corneal topographic mappingACTIVEMay 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 18, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance