USPTO serial 76536641
CUTLERY PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CUTLERY PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $548*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
HUNGHORM, KOWLOON, HK
Other trademarks owned by CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
HUNGHORM, KOWLOON, HK
Other trademarks owned by CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
NORWALK, CA
NORWALK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Davis
Brian M. Davis VLP LAW GROUP LLP5960 Fairview RdSuite 400Charlotte, NC 28210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, carving, paring, boning knives, offset bread knife, cook's knives, butcher knives, pie knives; roast beef knives; meat cleaver; dough cutter; pasta fork, slotted spoon; salad fork, cook's fork; salad spoon; flatware, namely, forks, knives and spoons; hand tools, namely, manually operated knife sharpeners | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2003 |
| 021 | Household utensils, namely, skimmers and spatulas; salad tongs; serving tongs; brushes for basting meats; rolling pins; whisks; serving ladles; pie servers | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CUTLERY PRECISION COMPANY, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MW POLAR
- Other trademarks owned by MW POLAR
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named CUTLERY PRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| May 28, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |