USPTO serial 76536683
THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3147105Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
CALGARY, ALBERTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ross W. Swanson
ROSS W SWANSON DUNCAN & CRAIG LLP10060 JASPER AVE STE 2800EDMONTON, AB T5J 3V9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate service consisting of leasing of commercial real estate; operating market places for sellers of residential, commercial and recreational real estate; real estate property management services; and real estate brokering services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | real estate development consulting services; planning and development of resorts, consisting of facilities for alpine, cross-country and wilderness skiing, skating, snowmobiling, golf, tennis, hiking, bicycling, fishing, water-sports, and equestrian sports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment and sporting services, namely resorts, consisting of facilities for alpine, cross-country and wilderness skiing, skating, snowmobiling, golf, tennis, hiking, bicycling, fishing, water-sports equestrian sports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Hotel services consisting of resort hotels, inns, and motels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Health and wellness spas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |