USPTO serial 76536740
MXSUITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MXSUITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON H. FREUND
GORDON H FREUND MATRIKON INC1800 10405 JASPER AVEEDMONTON, AB T5J 3N4CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE WHICH MANAGES AND SCHEDULES MANUFACTURING PROCESSES | ACTIVE | Nov 24, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |