Drawing for ECOPAY

USPTO serial 76536849

ECOPAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ECOPAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. KROLL

MICHAEL J KROLL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP50 S 6TH ST STE 1500INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in providing an integrated suite of software for payment switching, clearing and settlement for multiple parties in the payment processing lifecycle for use by financial institutions, payment processors, retailers and card associationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2006CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 16, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 15, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance