USPTO serial 76536882
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Midge M. Hyman
MIDGE M HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING CHILDREN'S ACTIVITIES, NAMELY GAMES, ARTS AND CRAFTS, STORIES, POEMS, JOKES, ADVICE, INFORMATION ABOUT SCHOOL, SPORTS, AND PRAYERS VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, NONE RELATING TO YACHTING OR RUGBY | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |