USPTO serial 76536942
DONTE DEVOXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DONTE DEVOXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | PANTS, SHIRTS, JACKET, SHOES | ABANDONED | Dec 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |