Drawing for KELLIE LITTLE

USPTO serial 76537011

KELLIE LITTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KELLIE LITTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret Polson

Margaret Polson Patent Law Offices of Rick Martin, PCPO Box 1839Longmont, CO 80502UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Hair coloring kits comprised of, namely, color brushes, color bowls, mirrors and clips; hairbrushes; hair combsACTIVE—
026Hair accessories, namely, clips, nets bows, hair ties, hair bands, hair jewelry and hair pinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 30, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance