Drawing for ENGAGED APPLICATIONS

USPTO serial 76537074

ENGAGED APPLICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGAGED APPLICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Jordan

LYNN M JORDAN FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones; telephone switches; wireless communications equipment, namely, cellular mobile telephones, cellular mobile telephone switches, base stations, transmitters, transceivers, receivers, repeaters, multiplexors, controllers, antennae, test bays, microwave radios, repeaters and regenerators; transmitter/receiver digital processors; transmission equipment, namely, copper cable, fiber optic cable; transmitters, transceivers, receivers, repeaters, multiplexers, digital span lines and trunks, digital processors, global computer network telephony, voice, computer and data networking equipment, namely, routers, bridges, hubs, ethernet switches, ethernet pc cards, servers, global computer network appliances, namely, firewalls and equipment for caching, load balancing and traffic managing; global computer network telephony, network managers and controllers, fiber optic transport equipment for broadband connectivity using photonic wave division multiplexing, namely optical network interfaces, programmable transport terminals, cross-connect apparatus and fiber optical data links; and operational and applications software for all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance