USPTO serial 76537079
OLIVERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3315060Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLIVERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
EUROALIMENT PROVEEDOR DE ALIMENTOS DE CALIDAD, S.L.
25214 Rossello, Lerida, ES
Other trademarks owned by EUROALIMENT PROVEEDOR DE ALIMENTOS DE CALIDAD, S.L.
Brisbane, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Berger
PACIFIC GOURMET INC. PACIFIC GOURMET INC.380 VALLEY DRIVEBRISBANE, CA 94005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | OLIVE OIL | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC GOURMET INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC GOURMET INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EUROALIMENT PROVEEDOR DE ALIMENTOS DE CALIDAD, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC GOURMET INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named OLIVERA
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |