Drawing for INTEGRITY EXPERTISE INTEGRATION EFFICIENCY

USPTO serial 76537266

INTEGRITY EXPERTISE INTEGRATION EFFICIENCY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3036267Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 27, 2005
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTEGRITY EXPERTISE INTEGRATION EFFICIENCY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James F. Voegeli

James F. Voegeli 3M Company2501 Hudson Road220-9E-01St. Paul, MN 55144

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MEDICAL RECORDS MANAGEMENTSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDOct 26, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 20, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 27, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 15, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 7, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 26, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 26, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Apr 26, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 3, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 14, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance