USPTO serial 76537316
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, the dissemination of advertising materials for others via the Internet and advertising material, namely, brochures; providing television and radio advertising for others; production of television commercials; promoting products and services of third parties through product endorsements, namely, providing consumer product information via the Internet; auctioneering services; wholesale and retail store services, featuring, food, beverages, toys, appliance, furniture, games, plants, sporting goods, eye wear, kitchen ware, cards and gifts, novelties, crafts, office and home supplies, clothing apparel, movies, music and consumer electronics; business management services; distributorships in the field of games, toys, computers, cell phones, food, beverages, water, pop, fruit juices, non alcoholic beverages, general merchandise, clothing, tools, hardware, health and beauty products, luggage, hand bags, and eye wear | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 042 | Engineering consultation services, namely, rendering of designs, schematics, ideas, drawings for commercial structures; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; computer software design services for others; consumer product safety testing; consultation services in the field of automotive design and engineering for others; design and testing for new product development; design and testing of new products for others; testing or research on electricity; engineering consultation; scientific research; licensing of intellectual property; copyright management consultation, copyright managements; patent agency and industrial property consultation; patent licensing; design, creation, hosting and maintenance of Internet sites for third parties; design creation, hosting, maintenance of web sites for others; hosting of digital content on the Internet; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; industrial design; intellectual property consultation; mechanical engineering; medical and scientific research, namely, for the purpose of developing new products and discovering new ways of saving lives; registration of domain names for identification of users a global computer network; consultation service of others in the field of aerospace engineering; research and design of automobiles, aircraft, water craft | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; self service restaurants, delicatessen services; cafes, carry-out restaurants, snack bars | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2019 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2019 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2018 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |