Drawing for STRANGE CHANGE

USPTO serial 76537465

STRANGE CHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRANGE CHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Rush Hicks, Jr.

J RUSH HICKS JR1114 17TH AVE S STE 202NASHVILLE, TN 37212UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028children's toys, namely, toy molding apparatus for making toy objects made of deformable material which returns to its original shape when heatedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 25, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 30, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2005LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Mar 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance