Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76537506?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76537506. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns EXPRESSIONS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76537506, the listed owner(s) include: Sweetheart Cup Company Inc., SOLO CUP OPERATING CORPORATION.

What is USPTO serial number 76537506?

Serial number 76537506 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark EXPRESSIONS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover EXPRESSIONS?

The public record lists International Classes: 016. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76537506

EXPRESSIONS

Q: What is the current status of EXPRESSIONS?

EXPRESSIONS (76537506) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Aug 5, 2003
Status date: Nov 7, 2006
Registration date: —
Examiner: BRACEY, KAREN
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Sweetheart Cup Company Inc.
Oshkosh, WI
Other trademarks owned by Sweetheart Cup Company Inc.
SOLO CUP OPERATING CORPORATION
HIGHLAND PARK, IL
Other trademarks owned by SOLO CUP OPERATING CORPORATION

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda A. Kuczma, Julie Brown Ackerman, William J. Allen, Matthew P. Becker, Phoebe Phillips Bower, Justin Busch, Marc S. Cooperman, Ted L. Field, Shawn P. Gorman, Michael J. Harris, Wendell W. Harris, Allen E. Hoover, Aimee Boss Kolz, Michael L. Krashin,

LINDA A KUCZMA BANNER & WITCOFF LTD10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
016	Paper Napkins, Placemats and Table Covers	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Aug 5, 2009	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Mar 7, 2007	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Jan 4, 2007	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Dec 23, 2006	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Nov 7, 2006	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Nov 7, 2006	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Oct 13, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 26, 2006	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Apr 25, 2006	RECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED	—
Apr 25, 2006	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 5, 2006	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Apr 3, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 3, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 3, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Oct 3, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 25, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2004	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Dec 30, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 22, 2004	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 22, 2004	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—