Drawing for MITSUI POLYPRO

USPTO serial 76537597

MITSUI POLYPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MITSUI POLYPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

CORY M AMRON VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for general industrial use, namely, chemical preparations for use in plastic products, namely, for use as fillers in manufacturing, plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles, plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of plastic sheets and films, unprocessed synthetic resins and unprocessed plastics for general industrial use; unprocessed plastics in the form of powders, pastes and liquids, for further industrial and agricultural use or manufactureACTIVE—
017Synthetic rubbers; rubber cords and rubber laces; packaging containers made of rubber, and rubber stoppers, rubber lids and caps, all for industrial use; and plastics in the form of processed powders, processed pastes, processed liquids, fibers, capillaries, emulsions, pellets, granules, films, sheets, plates, blocks, rods and pipes, all for further industrial and agricultural use or manufacture; padding and stuffing materials of rubber and plasticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 31, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 5, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance