Drawing for THE INDEPENDENCE

USPTO serial 76538302

THE INDEPENDENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE INDEPENDENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW D. PRICE

MARK B HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20045-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Bath tubs; walk-in bath tubs; and bath tub whirlpool jetsABANDONEDMar 26, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 5, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 5, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 29, 2004LIECLEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION—
Jun 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 13, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance