Drawing for PROPHETS AND MUSIC

USPTO serial 76538475

PROPHETS AND MUSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROPHETS AND MUSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL M CISLO

DANIEL M CISLO, CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD's, DVD's, and cassettes featuring music with a religious themeACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs featuring music with a religious themeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 18, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance