USPTO serial 76538727
FORT TOTTEN GATEWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORT TOTTEN GATEWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Joseph English
D JOSEPH ENGLISH DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | LEASING OF REAL PROPERTY; LEASING OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE, RETAIL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES; LAND ACQUISITION, NAMELY, REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF REAL ESTATE; MORTGAGE PROCUREMENT FOR OTHERS FOR RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, OFFICE, RETAIL AND INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FORT TOTTEN GATEWAY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |