USPTO serial 76538750
ST LUKE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ST LUKE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MEDICAL LABORATORY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | HOSPITAL SERVICES; MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; MEDICAL AND PHYSICAL REHABILITATION SERVICES; MEDICAL CLINICAL SERVICES FOR TREATING MEDICAL PATIENTS REMOTE FROM A HOSPITAL; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGICAL SERVICES PERFORMED OUTSIDE OF HOSPITAL SETTINGS; PROVIDING MEDICAL AND PHYSICIAN OFFICE FACILITIES; AND MEDICAL TRIAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CLINICAL AND HEALTH RELATED INFORMATION VIA NURSE CALL CENTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |