USPTO serial 76538760
MEEMSERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEEMSERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna M. Weinstein
DONNA M WEINSTEIN FOLEY HOAG LLPWORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software development tools to facilitate the development of federated network environments for distributed, nomadic, pervasive and embedded computing systems; software development tools which enable disparate devices, appliances, software and systems to dynamically authenticate, integrate and inter-operate in a uniform manner; software development tools which facilitate the development of distributed, nomadic, software applications and services that can operate in and across dynamic, semi-permanent, mobile or volatile network environments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pierce IPDC Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Pierce IPDC Pte Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by MAJITEK INTERNATIONAL PTE. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MEEMSERVER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |