USPTO serial 76538810
AQUALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AQUALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Eau Claire, WI
Eau Claire, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ernest Grumbles
ERNEST GRUMBLES MERCHANT & GOULDPO BOX 291080 S 8TH ST STE 3200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | toilets sold exclusively through registrant's home improvement retail stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |