USPTO serial 76538839
SLIM LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SLIM LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Phillips
Craig Phillips Dickinson Wright PLLC2600 West Big BeaverSuite 300Troy, MI 48084Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gaming equipment, namely cabinets and housings for electronically and electro-mechanically operated gaming machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLE KEPRO INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Cole Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cole Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cole Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SLIM LINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| May 15, 2019 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 2, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 22, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |