USPTO serial 76538869
PROFLUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFLUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER A. HACKLER
WALTER A HACKLER PATENT LAW OFFICES2372 SE BRISTOL ST STE BNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-0755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Toilets, bidets, faucets, toilet seats, toilet lid covers, plumbing fittings namely, bibbs, ball cocks, traps, valves, sink strainers, toilet bowls, toilet latch balls, toilet tanks, bath tubs, toilet seat dampers, toilet flushing systems and pressure assisted toilet flush systems including tanks, floats, handles, chains, flush valves, water valves, air valves, anti-siphon valves, check valves, flush glands, flush baffles, hoses, seals, covers, flanges, and flappers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |