USPTO serial 76538997
THE PREMIER CONDOMINIUM COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2946886Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 2005
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE PREMIER CONDOMINIUM COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Miami, FL
MIAMI, FL
MIAMI, FL
Miami, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq.
Manuel R. Valcarcel, Esq. Greenberg Traurig, P.A.333 S.E. Second Avenue, Suite 4400Miami, FL 33131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real Estate Development Services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Heights, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CRESCENT HEIGHTS IP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CRESCENT HEIGHTS IP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Crescent Heights, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named THE PREMIER CONDOMINIUM COMPANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 3, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 13, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |