Drawing for TOWER HOUSE

USPTO serial 76539200

TOWER HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TOWER HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

RONALD E SHAPIRO RONALD E SHAPIRO1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MCLEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry; precious gemstones; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, chronometers, watches, and clocks; imitation jewelry; brooches; cufflinks; ornamental pins; tie pins; watches; watch straps; clocks; precious metal money clips; key rings of precious metalACTIVE—
018leather and imitations of leather sold in bulk; animal skins and hides; trunks and traveling bags; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harnesses and saddlery; luggage; rucksacks, tote bags, briefcases, pocket wallets, purses, coin purses, drawstring pouches, and credit card cases; briefcase-type portfolios; key casesACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants, shorts, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, dresses, skirts, blouses, jackets, coats, underwear, lingerie, pajamas, and swimwear; footwear, namely, boots, shoes, slippers, sandals, athletic shoes, sneakers; socks and hosiery; headgear, namely, hats, caps, and berets; scarves; gloves; mittens; beltsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 4, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 24, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance