USPTO serial 76539222
MP60
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MP60?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLPSuite #11001050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank tape media for use with automatic tape libraries; blank digital recording tape for use with disk-based back-up systems; magnetic tape drives, computer tape cartridges, computer tape cartridge autoloaders, automatic magnetic and digital storage tape libraries with multiple computer data drives, multiple computer tape cartridges and automatic computer tape cartridge load/unload systems and the software required to operate the magnetic tape drives, autoloaders and libraries, all for storage, retrieval, back-up and delivery applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |