Drawing for IAREA

USPTO serial 76539308

IAREA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, CHRISTINA B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IAREA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Kaufman

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK ET AL1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Cellular telephones services; telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of cellular telephones; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; paging services; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network by computers; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network by cellular telephones; providing wireless local area network (LAN) telecommunication connections; electronic mail services; providing and administrating on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users connected to the Internet concerning entertainment, education, teaching, culture, music, sports, fashion, language, images, living information, personal computer, IT related matter, current events and lifestyles; providing and administrating on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users about weather, news, money and banking, books, movies, entertainment, lifestyles, insurance, travel, shopping, gourmet, traffic information, music, games, fortune-telling, sports, hobbies, outdoor, animated cartoons, personal computers, information technology (IT) related information, television and radio programs, show business and education; rental of telephone apparatus, facsimile machines and other telecommunication apparatus and instrumentsACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer search engine software; hosting web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network, hosting web sites of others on a computer server for a mobile telecommunication network; providing temporary use of computer programs, non-downloadable computer programs for use as a spreadsheet and computer search engine, for word processing, computer aided design (cad), retrieval, game and utilityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 8, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 25, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 21, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance